MCNTalk
News, Insights & Opinions

Brian L. Grant MD
Founder and Medical Director, MCN

This op-ed piece in the New York Times, along with many of the reader comments, are well worth reading. Obesity is a global public health emergency, and likely has greater impact on the state of U.S. health than tobacco use has had at its worst. I find myself musing on the similarities between the public’s approach to obesity and global warming, another topic that many choose to doubt despite metrics that suggests its truth. Like the warming earth, the fact that as a society we are getting fatter should be impossible to deny. The causes for this growing obesity problem, or whether or not there even is a problem for individuals or society, however, are debated. Related steps to address the problem are also heavily argued. After all, the growth in our girths is a new normal, while folks rail against airline seats rather than confront those of us who can’t fit into them.

The writers of this article, a pediatrician and economist, have a number of suggestions heavy on public policy changes and government intervention. Suggested changes may be desirable, but to be sure, they will at minimum take time to implement and most likely be heavily fought by well-funded lobbies and public outcry. These policy changes will do too little and be too late for those currently afflicted. Unfortunately, the authors say virtually nothing about individual contributions to the problem (without doubt aided by the seduction of cheap and ample calories), and choices that we can and must make on behalf of ourselves and our families today. People can’t wait or hope for government to change how much and what we choose to eat.

What once seemed like an innocent slobbery kiss from a dog now has the nickname “the lick of death.” Capnocytophaga canimorsus is a commonly found bacteria in the saliva of healthy dogs and cats. In most cases this bacteria is not harmful, but in rare cases this bacteria can get into the human blood stream and cause death.

Greg Manteufel has survived the lick of death, but not without serious losses. At the beginning stages of the infection he thought he had a fever or the flu, but then he became delirious and dark spots started covering his body that looked like bruises. His wife rushed him to the hospital and within a week, Greg had lost his legs and hands.

For the full account read this article from the Washington Post.

Here’s some exciting health news to kick start your weekend: for the first time, scientists have found a way to lower risk of dementia.

Dementia is primarily affected by genes and age, both of which are out of our own control. It has taken years for scientists to find a variable related to dementia that humans could change. This variable is blood pressure. Through a study, more than 9,300 elderly people who had heart problems, or were prone to developing heart problems, were asked to lower their blood pressure to either 120mmHg or 140 mmHg. The study found that people who lowered their blood pressure to under 120mmHg also lowered their risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which is the gateway to dementia.

“Controlling blood pressure is not only good for the heart but good for the brain,” says Dr. Jeff Williamson, chief of geriatric medicine at Wake Forest School of Medicine, and one of the lead investigators in the trial. “This is the first intervention of any kind that has been proven in a randomized controlled trial to reduce the risk of mild cognitive impairment.”

Because the subjects were only studied for five years, doctors can only conclude that lower blood pressure will reduce the risk of MCI. Dementia takes a lot longer to develop over time, so scientist can only infer that it will lower the risk of dementia, and this secondary finding will need to be tested in the future.

According to this article, the future is a little brighter as we now know that lower blood pressure leads to healthier and stronger brains, and that keeping blood pressure under control may be a way that some people can slow the deterioration of the brain that can lead to dementia and even Alzheimer’s.

Unemployment rates fell to 3.8 percent in May, 2018 – an 18-year low — and the number of disability insurance claims and number of Americans seeking Social Security disability benefits is also dropping. Specifically, per government officials, fewer than 1.5 million Americans applied to the Social Security Administration for disability coverage in 2017, the lowest number since 2002. Applications are running at an even lower rate this year.

This article explains that because the economy is strong and maintaining steady rates of growth, employers are more willing to hire people from a diverse labor pool — including those with disabilities — and to make accommodations with job functions, pay, and other expectations. The strength of the economy also sparks a more optimistic attitude among people with disabilities searching through available opportunities.

Some other factors have also influenced this shift. One of these factors driven by basic demographic shifts is that as aging baby boomers receive Social Security retirement benefits and Medicare, they no longer require disability benefits. Additionally, because of the expansion of Medicaid in 33 states and the District of Columbia and the improved access to insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act, the disability program has become a less obvious way for people to obtain health care coverage. A final factor the article identifies is that it is simpler hard now to qualify for Social Security benefits than it was in the past.

One case study explored in the article is that of Christian Borrero, who had been receiving Social Security benefits throughout his adult life. He  was offered a full-time job as a receptionist at Kurtz Bros, an amazing opportunity for full-time work with benefits, but also one where he would be earning less than his disability income, to the tune of $895 per month. Borrero chose full-time employment and as expected, his Social Security benefits emded. When his employers found out about his situation, they modified his position to include additional responsibilities, thereby raising his pay to cover his otherwise lost income. Although this wouldn’t happen in every case, Mr. Borrero hopes to inspire others with his story.

Five men in New York have now been caught as the ring leaders of a federal indictment and insurance fraud in New York. These men recruited individuals to stage “slip-and-fall accidents” in order to fake injuries. The injuries then led to legal and medical appointments with enlisted doctors, lawyers, and finance companies who followed along with the con. Countless unnecessary procedures were done, racking up medical bills for insurance companies to pay. Peter Kalkanis, the leader of this scam, would coach plaintiffs on how to fake their injuries convincingly. The State has since revoked his license.

At Medical Consultants Network, we believe in the power of a second look. Our providers across the country complete examinations on claimants and injured parties, many with disabilities or work-related injuries. Some  injuries are severe, some examinees recover after months of treatment, and some situations are quickly resolved. It’s the power of the second look that helps our providers make unbiased observations, conclusions, and recommendations on our claimants’ conditions and prognoses, and our staff to apply high standards at each step of the process to deliver evidence-based reports.

GMOs (genetically modified organisms) have been labeled by many consumers and food producers alike as being a serious health risk, and eliminating them from foods has become a major dietary — and advertising — trend.

Brands scramble to advertise that their products don’t contain GMOs, but this article explores the science to conclude that “there is no reputable scientific evidence that direct genetic modification – instead of slower genetic modification – has any health effects of any kind.”

Anti-GMO activists have been fueling the movement against GMOs despite scientific evidence proving their safety. This article presents the idea that the anti-GMO movement originated more from religious theology than in scientific facts. Myths have developed that GMOs increase a multiple of seemingly random and wide-ranging situations such as increased suicide rates, incidents of autism or cancer, homosexuality, and infertility. These types of scare tactics have worked over the years as consumers have demanded changes, and grocers scramble to meet demand.