Portal Login:
  • Clients
  • Providers
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
    Portal Login:
  • Clients
  • Providers
  • About MCN
  • Careers
  • MCNTalk
  • Contact Us

MCN | Medical Consultants Network

The Power of a Second Look

  • Services
    • Independent Medical Examinations
    • Medical Peer Reviews
    • Bill Review Services
    • Utilization Reviews
  • Expertise
    • Short and Long-Term Disability
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Auto/PIP/Casualty/Liability
    • Independent Review Organization Services
  • For Clients
  • For Providers
  • Your Exam
    • About Your Exam
    • About Your External Review
    • Contact & Scheduling
  • Schedule Now
  • About MCN
  • MCNTalk
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

MCNTalk
News, Insights & Opinions

Home / MCNTalk / Medical Tourism – Another Example of a Seriously Flawed US...

August 5, 2013

Medical Tourism – Another Example of a Seriously Flawed US System

This article on hip replacement costs and the experiences of a medical tourist in Belgium highlights any number of issues. Yet most readers would yawn at the obvious – that we pay in the US multiples more for equal or lower health outcomes. The story describes a patient who was quoted a price of $78,000, NOT including surgeons fees for a hip replacement from a local US hospital. The patient was able to receive the same operation INCLUDING round trip air, for $13,660 at a private hospital in Belgium, including the surgeon’s fee. And the hip joint was made by the same US company that sells the device in the US for more than the cost of the entire procedure in Belgium.

Interest groups and politics (including partisan bickering), lack of courage at confronting and tackling the matter,  government indifference, and lack of economic skin in the game by patients mean we all get less for more. Government interference is decried by many, but it seems to work in the case of Belgium and others in Europe and elsewhere that regulate the medical market. The alternatives in settings like the US where healthcare is largely regarded as “free” by those who receive it has resulted in what we in America experience. We patients pay little more than a copay or deductible with the rest covered by private or government insurance. We have no incentive to shop, price compare and demand price transparency. But the cost borne by government and private payers is very real and the billions of dollars in excess GDP means that these funds are not available for other productive uses.

If cars, electronics or food were five times the price in the US than Europe, regardless of the logic, there would be a grey market and a hue and cry by those individuals footing the bills. Where is the outrage at the metrics described in this article? It is inconvenient and in the case of emergent situations, impossible to get on a plane and travel abroad for much cheaper care. And the patient who has no economic driver to do so has little reason to consider it.

In the end, we all pay via lower salaries, higher taxes, or both – fueling a bloated health care system enabled by indifference and ignorance.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Print

Tagged: Cost Containment, Health Policy, The Practice of Medicine 1 Comment

Previous Post
Next Post

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bryan J Treacy MD says

    August 6, 2013 at 7:08 am

    This is a succinct, direct and excellent viewpoint on the US health care system. The public has more “skin in the game” than they realize. Just look at your latest “explanation of benefits” statement from the last time you were at the doctor. Discounted fees contracted with physicians and hospitals place more and more costs on the health care consumer while they are also paying escalating premiums. We would all be better off paying for catastrophic health insurance and negotiating routine visits and tests.

    CNN reported that the number of “direct pay” physicians has doubled in the past year from 3% in 2012 to 6% in 2013. I am one of them. These physician’s fees are transparent and in line with a free market health system. I’ve also seen private hospitals discount their fees 65% for patients who are directly paying their bill. The premium savings are significant if out of pocket deductibles are raised so that insurance kicks in at 100% after $5000 or $10,000 per year. The rest can usually be negotiated and can be paid from the premium savings.

    See my post on Direct Pay Practices at http://www.womensultimatehealthcare.com

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The Quality Divide: What Makes a Quality IME Physician?
  • The Quality Divide: Is Your Vendor Driving IME Excellence?
  • The Quality Divide: When and How to Request an IME?
  • April Clinic Calendars Are Available
  • MCN’s Client Portal Login Page is Changing

Archives

Footer


  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Quick Links

  • Services
  • Expertise
  • About MCN
  • Careers

Division Headquarters

MCN
1200 5th Ave., Ste. 650
Seattle, WA 98101

See all offices

Email Us

General Inquiries: info@mcn.com
Sales & Marketing: marketing@mcn.com

Call Us

206.343.6100
800.248.6269

© Copyright 2023 Mitchell International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap